It depends on what one should consider a haiku. Not all of them obey to the formal rules (which are not so important what so ever).
The theme of a haiku should be meditation upon the nature. Or in this case nature is at the most a pretext, if not only a background.
The inner structure of a haiku should contain three steps: reference to something (what?) in time (when?) and space (where?). The equation might be simplified to What/When? or What/ Where? Here I think none of those is applicable.
In a haiku we should not use the main tropes as Europeans use: metaphor, comparison, iteration etc., but rather ellipse, paradox (antinomy), alliteration. Here the author used metaphor more than once (blooms the bud of joy, love waves rise and fall, shores of soul).
The haiku is written in the middle of the nature, in a moment of illumination, surprise, inspiration. This not seems to be the case.
As a conclusion: I would definitely not call these poems (or this poem) a haiku.